These provisions apply to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, regardless of whether the transaction occurred before its promulgation. Read more
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents on the boy or Lady tend not to approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they are able to do if they could cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who is a major, the few is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by regulation.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but just isn't binding precedent.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court might interfere with the summary or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it correct towards the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision of the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in help in the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. Since the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be attained, the decision on the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. Read more
If you find an error within the articles of the published opinion (such as a misspelled name or a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-thirty day period report for the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions would be the opinions that are filed to the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and tend to be not the court's final opinion.
Summaries of cases that shape the lives of young individuals, making sure a further understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and lovers alike.
eight. For your reasons stated over, this court finds the petition for being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend in the comments, and their request is Consequently acceded to. All pending applications, if any, are dismissed. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, check here Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.